|
|
| Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
|
| Support uws |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Jin Choi on Sunday, October 10 2004 @ 08:28 PM CDT |
I meant I.2.c which states
"Upon notice of dissolution, a maximum of three delegates from the club in question will be given the opportunity to explain to the Internal Administration Committee why the club should not be dissolved. The onus rests on the club to demonstrate this to the Internal Administration Committee"
Now, I know your argument Jacob. ESA has not been dissolved, but is rather on probationary status. On this point, I concede then that the Feds have not violated policy.
But think about this for a minute. Being on probation is just as bad as being dissolved. All rights and all priveleges are revoked - even the bank account is frozen. There is practically no difference between dissolution and probation - only that we are given two weeks before they dissolve us. It's as if we're held guilty until proven otherwise
But most importantly, this is besides the point. I'm not here to argue policy. I'm here to argue conduct. Had there been more communication, this situation would have been better resolved. Peacefully, as I say, with no hurt feelings.
In any case, I hear there will be a press-release soon with details including e-mails between ESA and Rick Theis. Soon, all the facts will be available for everyone.[ Parent ]
|
| |
|
