|
|
| Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
|
| Support uws |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Lawrence on Tuesday, October 19 2004 @ 11:44 AM CDT |
No I haven't. From my vantage point, those document didn't matter. Neither did ESA's imprudent statements.
Right there at the council meeting, ESA presented a new exec which had a different outlook on how to reform its club's structure. Council had taken no action prior to the meeting, so when we talk about FEDS giving olive branch after olive branch, that might have been FEDS exec acting apart from council.
I wanted councillors to re-word the suspension such that there was no pre-determined time length like "for the rest of the term". That was a point of contention that upset the members of the ESA more than anything else. It's just a sign of good faith if nothing else. I was disappointed that councillors were not interested in re-visiting the IAC decision to discuss the points of contention.[ Parent ]
|
| |
|
