|
|
| Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
|
| Support uws |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Litigator on Sunday, October 31 2004 @ 02:13 AM CST |
It was logical. As I have stated earlier I don't believe there was emotion involved in this.
I don't understand what logical means here. That his conclusion followed from his premises? The premises being that every adult Israeli is a combatant and the conclusion being that it's all right to kill the lot? And you're saying his premise was an innocent mistake? Come on. You yourself have said he's been an activist for over 30 years now.
By reserved, I mean that he was being very diplomatic. He wasn't acting like those crazed militants you see interview on TV.
What does that mean? That he wasn't screaming "Death to Israel" with his eyes bulging out and several of his arteries about to burst? And that somehow makes what he said more excusable? If anything, it makes it worse, since his statements can't be dismissed as an emotional outburst.[ Parent ]
|
| |
|
