|
|
| Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
|
| Support uws |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Yaacov on Monday, December 06 2004 @ 11:03 AM CST |
Lastly, the wording of the pro-WPIRG email was unorganized and rather brash (e.g. "WPIRG rocks!"). WPIRG's volunteers may understand the case for keeping the fee alive, but the argument has to be put to the student body as a whole, not just to WPIRGers.
It looks like WPIRG's 'response' was taken from an email sent out on the WPIRG announce list and was therefore intended for those who already support WPIRG. If you look at the advertisement in the current issue of Imprint, you can see the more measured, "calm, clear summary" that you (correctly, in my view) argued that WPIRG would benefit from.
---
"an ideology is a thought—economizing device" - Moisés Naim[ Parent ]
|
| |
|
