Welcome
Subscribe to our RSS feeds.

Get involved by joining our mailing lists.

Submit a news story to uwstudent.org.

Submit an event to uws' calendar.

Read what's hot on uwstudent.org.

Want to know more? Read our Frequently Asked Questions.

Check upcoming events on the calendar

The links on our links page point to interesting things.

User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

Sections
Home
Announce -- Feds
News
Not uws news
Reader-directed content
uws archive
uwstudent.org
Warrior Sports Reports

Support uws ?
In Association with Amazon.ca

K-W weather

uw411
search the uw phone directory by name, department, location + more





| 215 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Re: Follow-up
Authored by: gadfly on Wednesday, February 16 2005 @ 06:46 AM CST
I would suggest that X exercised bad judgment in trusting Z and not seeking independent confirmation. Would you really be willing to accuse somebody solely on hearsay?

Well, that's what you'd have to do in many cases, if only candidates could launch complaints against candidates. Otherwise Z could just launch the complain himself, and all would be well.

Secondly, this would be a very dangerous tactic, as a candidate who made this deal, and then felt disadvantaged, could still file a complaint.

Yeah, that was what I meant about it probably not working. The reward for 'defection' (to use Primer's Dilemma terminology) would be too great, especially in the 11th hour.

[ Parent ]

 Copyright © 2008 uwstudent.org
 All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.

Powered By