Welcome
Subscribe to our RSS feeds.

Get involved by joining our mailing lists.

Submit a news story to uwstudent.org.

Submit an event to uws' calendar.

Read what's hot on uwstudent.org.

Want to know more? Read our Frequently Asked Questions.

Check upcoming events on the calendar

The links on our links page point to interesting things.

User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

Sections
Home
Announce -- Feds
News
Not uws news
Reader-directed content
uws archive
uwstudent.org
Warrior Sports Reports

Support uws ?
In Association with Amazon.ca

K-W weather

uw411
search the uw phone directory by name, department, location + more





| 215 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Re: Follow-up
Authored by: gadfly on Wednesday, February 16 2005 @ 06:26 PM CST
But if all you have is hearsay, why lodge a complaint? Surely you'd be able to find at least one other witness? If you can't, surely that's a good sign that nothing happened.

But it wouldn't be hearsay for Z to launch the complaint. Granted, they wouldn't have much of a case without evidence from others. But disallowing all but candidates from filing complaints will lead to reliance on hearsay.

In any case, a useful guide is that the people who should be allowed to complain are those who are adversely affected by malpractice. And I think that includes the voting population too, not just other candidates.

Candidates might lose the election, sure, but it's the voting public who loses if someone is elected who's guilty of these sorts of offences.

[ Parent ]

 Copyright © 2008 uwstudent.org
 All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.

Powered By