Welcome
Subscribe to our RSS feeds.

Get involved by joining our mailing lists.

Submit a news story to uwstudent.org.

Submit an event to uws' calendar.

Read what's hot on uwstudent.org.

Want to know more? Read our Frequently Asked Questions.

Check upcoming events on the calendar

The links on our links page point to interesting things.

User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

Sections
Home
Announce -- Feds
News
Not uws news
Reader-directed content
uws archive
uwstudent.org
Warrior Sports Reports

Support uws ?
In Association with Amazon.ca

K-W weather

uw411
search the uw phone directory by name, department, location + more





| 60 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Re: Free Trade and ethics II
Authored by: Ross Jordan on Wednesday, April 06 2005 @ 12:35 AM CDT

But that's the point, if multinationals can switch places and labour can't, then multinationals control the wage markets, eroding higher wages (and other benefits) in places where citizens fought for them, and not allowing developing countries to move up the ladder.


This doesn't follow.
If a multinational moves to a impoverished country, demand increases -- supply remains fixed; and so wages go up. Yes, its true that if wages go up too much, the company may just exit the country and move to a cheaper one.

There's real evidence of this too -- the wages in China have increased significantly in the last 10 years, to the point where China is not the best deal for many companies anymore.

[ Parent ]

 Copyright © 2008 uwstudent.org
 All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.

Powered By