|
|
| Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
|
| Support uws |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Giant Space Hamster on Wednesday, April 06 2005 @ 03:12 PM CDT |
Eureka! but that's what I'm saying, that's why it would be more beneficial to implement policies that would NOT allow companies to just to pick up and leave.
But if they can't leave, then they won't enter in the first place. And I just don't see this 'not entering' as a good thing. I do see the 'not leaving' being good, but I don't see how you can achieve that without having 'not entering'.
But there are also a finite number of jobs
I don't think I agree with this assumption. Historically, it doesn't hold. There are more jobs now than a century ago and for each century before that. (Now the jobs per unit of population may or may not be dropping--that is still debatable--the total number of jobs is clearly increasing.) Can you provide evidence or reasoning for the claim of a finite number of jobs?
That's because the view I'm expressing is completely opposed to what Friedman has to say.
Well, then. One of you is clearly wrong. (Or more probably, the truth is somewhere in the middle.)[ Parent ]
|
| |
|
