|
|
| Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
|
| Support uws |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: David Mandelzys on Wednesday, April 06 2005 @ 03:56 PM CDT |
"But if they can't leave, then they won't enter in the first place. And I just don't see this 'not entering' as a good thing. I do see the 'not leaving' being good, but I don't see how you can achieve that without having 'not entering'."
They'll come because they want to sell!!!!!
Especially in the Indian example there are 1 billion people to sell to and companies want access. If you tie that access to production or planned trade, then u can get them to come and stay.
"I don't think I agree with this assumption. Historically, it doesn't hold. There are more jobs now than a century ago and for each century before that. (Now the jobs per unit of population may or may not be dropping--that is still debatable--the total number of jobs is clearly increasing.) Can you provide evidence or reasoning for the claim of a finite number of jobs?"
There is none seasonal unemployment.,.,,, not arguing the finite number of jobs isn't growing over time, but at any given time there are a finite number of jobs, and we don't run at full employment especially on a global scale.
"Well, then. One of you is clearly wrong. (Or more probably, the truth is somewhere in the middle.)"
See my other post.[ Parent ]
|
| |
|
