Welcome
Subscribe to our RSS feeds.

Get involved by joining our mailing lists.

Submit a news story to uwstudent.org.

Submit an event to uws' calendar.

Read what's hot on uwstudent.org.

Want to know more? Read our Frequently Asked Questions.

Check upcoming events on the calendar

The links on our links page point to interesting things.

User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

Sections
Home
Announce -- Feds
News
Not uws news
Reader-directed content
uws archive
uwstudent.org
Warrior Sports Reports

Support uws ?
In Association with Amazon.ca

K-W weather

uw411
search the uw phone directory by name, department, location + more





| 202 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
True, but
Authored by: Albert on Tuesday, May 17 2005 @ 11:19 AM CDT
Just because this apparently somewhat pragmatic change is being made does not imply a deeper consideration isn't being worked on. You are of course right when you say that if the standards are acceptable then the failing should occur, or if not they should be fixed.

I do not believe by saying "Opps, we don't want this group of people failing right now" doesn't imply that is the only thing they are doing.

Likewise we (student leaders etc) should make sure that it is not in fact the only thing they do.

There is only a problem here if changing these rules is all that happens, then this measure is a shallow solution. As stop gap to figure out what is really happening, it doesn't seem so bad.

[ Parent ]

 Copyright © 2008 uwstudent.org
 All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.

Powered By